(For t-shirts or to donate go to "Donate" below.)
A. Bralich, Ph.D. releases guest editorial in favor of the family of four income
December 19, 2011 (MMD Newswire) - - Current frustrations among the American voter have reached a level not seen since the Viet Nam war, perhaps since the founding of the country. This is reflected in single digit congressional
approval, the Tea Party, and the Occupy movements. The following statement, available for reprint, is in support of a solution to the problem via a surtax on the rich that can be implemented in the 2012 election and provide real solutions to calm a growing
mass movement by the voters to get their jobs and their lives back. TaxTheRichDotName, a grass roots political action group to affect positive change in the distribution of wealth, is offering this statement (also available at YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/user/pbralich?feature=mhee):
Tax the Rich: Thoroughly, profoundly, and Punitively.
Growing up in a lower, middle-class family in the mid-west, my parents and other adults were all aware of the family of four income and what jobs and
college majors would likely provide such an income. There was little interest in jobs that paid millions, but great interest in jobs that allowed you to raise a family, own a house and a car in a safe neighborhood with good schools, a hospital, a church and
convenient shopping. In fact, an interest in wealth beyond that was considered tawdry at best and dismissed with lines such as, "We don't want that kind of money."
This was an outgrowth of the efforts of the World
War II generation who came home from war to create an economy that included jobs with family of four incomes, security, 40-hour work weeks, vacations, insurance, retirement, pension plans, and social security. They provided good schools, immunizations and
doctor's checkups for their kids, and they saw pets and family vacations as important to raising children. They also supported unions to help guarantee the whole family of four system. My father would leave work decisively everyday at five to go home for dinner
and take care of his family. We always expected him at six minutes after five. His insistence on leaving not earlier or later than five was part of the discipline that the World War II generation agreed was necessary to create the family of four economy. It
was not "greed is good": it was good-hearted and family oriented. It was the true right wing. The right wing that people feel nostalgia for that was destroyed by Reagan and the broken right wing that has followed him. It was not the right wing that would bury
the family of four income and attack job security, 40-hour work weeks, vacations, insurance, retirement, pension plans, and social security. It was a generation that kept a wary eye on the wealthy, recognizing the sneers, spin and frozen countenances of the
Since Reagan all of that has diminished significantly as the wealthy have continued to take more and more family of four incomes out of their companies, their communities, and the stockholders pockets, and
put it in the pockets of the upper 10%. There is no excuse for it. It is not based on family values; it is not based on the family of four income; it is based on personal greed. Trickle down is as much of a joke to them as is the claim that cutting the taxes
for the rich will create jobs. Both are snide dismissals of a thinking public who recognize that trickle down and cutting the taxes on the rich are merely more hands in their pockets taking away the wealth that they have rightfully earned and which deserves
to go to their families. There is no trickle down and the wealthy do not create jobs.
Let's assume for the sake of easy math that a family of four income is $50,000 per year. With that figure in mind, we can note
that each $100,000 executive bonus takes 2 family of four incomes out of the company, the community, and U.S. economy. Every seven figure annual income takes 20 family of four incomes out of the company, the community, and the U.S. economy every year. Every
nine figure annual income takes 200 family of four incomes out of the company, the community, and the U.S. economy every year. One $25,000,000 severance package for failed performance takes 520 family of four incomes out of the company, the community and the
U.S. economy every time.
The presence of ATM's saved banks billions in salary packages and yet rather than paying us 50 cents each time we use it, they charge us instead and think that we are unaware of the guile
behind this. There are countless examples of the shiftless, cunning, conning mentality of the broken right wing but little as yet that we can do about it. They turn to us and say we are going to have to take cuts in Medicare and the minimum wage and shamelessly
turn around and give themselves millions in bonuses for having done so. They turn to us and say, like Herman Cain, "Don't complain. Go out and get a job and earn your wealth." This jaded, sadistic dig is just one of many that are eating at the hearts of the
American public. The wealthy look, act, walk and talk like perps and pimps because they are. Their targets, the American family, look, act, walk and talk like vics because they are.
They aren't that good. We are.
They did not provide the talent, creativity, hard work, inventiveness, and social skills necessary to run a business. We did. They merely developed a set of financial tools to wrench the profits from us and line their own pockets. They lower the wages, remove
benefits, raise our fees and then when we have the audacity to say my child needs a doctor or my grandfather is bedridden, and I can no longer care for him, they say, "You should have thought of that earlier. You should have worked harder." And then for the
brilliance of those rejoinders, they give themselves another million dollar bonus and create a 9 figure income for a crony.
They are not making this wealth, they are taking it, and it is time to take it back. They
do not grow their companies, their communities, or the U.S. economy: in fact the problems in America today are precisely the result of this shift in the distribution of wealth and this destruction of the inventor, the talent and the creative, and it is attributable
to one thing and one thing alone: the greed of today's wealthy and their inability to make judgments about anything other than the size of their wallets and their next bonus. They could see Social Security running at a profit if they did not see a huge sum
of money that they could transfer into their own pockets. They could realize that government jobs are good jobs if they did not see the government payroll as a target. If they did not have their hands and minds on everybody else's wealth, they could see that
local, state and federal governments would be far more interested in creating jobs with family of four incomes than the wealthy would ever be. There would be no mansions or yachts to pay for if the government were creating the jobs, and their certainly would
be no 7,8, & 9 figure incomes or bonuses. The right wing has gone so far off track as to see themselves as the new fascists and liberals as the new non-Aryans. Jesus Christ was a liberal, and we are all sure that he still believes in giving to the poor,
not creating them. The family of four income represents a distribution of wealth that would be expected of a Christian country. The current distribution of wealth looks like the Rome of Christ's time more than anything that developed out of Christianity.
The frustration of the American voting public is profound and justified and the occupy movements indicate the mere tip of an iceberg of a growing mass movement to get jobs, houses, and families back from the broken right wing
that took it, the evil broken right wing that took it.
Fortunately, there is a solution at hand to return the distribution of wealth to the way it was in the 50's: we simply need to surtax the rich. President Obama
currently has a 5.6% surtax the rich bill on the table, and we can look at this as a good start that hits exactly the right note. We can surtax them to pay the national debt; we can surtax them to fix social security; we can surtax them to put student grants
and loans back on the table to the levels they were in the 70's. we can surtax them again and again and again until the wealthy sit-up straight, fold their hands nicely on the table, admit they were wrong, and put the money back. We can also be sure that a
surtax the rich bill is as easily available and as easily implemented as a draft bill. The former to defend us from the rich who have demonstrated they can become internal enemies and the latter to defend us from external enemies.
There is no need for discussion or debate: this not about a fair tax. It is punitive. We can make or break the 2012 election around the surtax. President Obama has one ready to go. How about the family values right wing (not the broken right wing)?
When they say to us "Who's going to pay for this?" We're going to turn to them and say, " You are!" and then press the voting button for the surtax.
"Without the pen of the author of Common Cents,
the sword of Washington would have been raised in vain." Adams
For more essays on the Family of Four Income Platform, just google Philip Bralich.